Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Acta Medica Philippina ; : 531-535, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-877291

ABSTRACT

Objective@#This study aims to determine recurrence and complication rates among patients who underwent three current pterygium treatment techniques: preoperative subpterygeal injection of mitomycin C, intraoperative application of mitomycin with pterygium excision and pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft. @*Methods@#This is a randomized controlled clinical trial in a tertiary hospital. We included patients with diagnosed primary pterygium and who underwent either: A = pre-operative injection of 0.02% mitomycin C one month prior to pterygium excision; B = pterygium excision with intraoperative mitomycin C application; or C = pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft. @*Results@#We included 111 patients: a total of 120 eyes randomized to 3 groups (A, B, C) at 40 eyes per group. After 24 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rates among the groups (6/40 [15%] in groups A and B and 2/40 cases [5%] in group C; P=0.29). No complications were noted in groups B and C, while 1 case of scleral thinning was noted in group A. There was no significant difference in the complication rates among the three procedures (P=1.00).@*Conclusion@#There were no significant differences in the recurrence and complication rates among the three techniques. Careful patient selection and follow-up are recommended to prevent complications such as scleral thinning.


Subject(s)
Pterygium , Mitomycin , Autografts , Conjunctiva , Conjunctivitis , Transplantation, Autologous
2.
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology ; : 73-77, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-633488

ABSTRACT

@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> To compare the recurrence rate after conjunctival autograft alone versus conjunctival autograft with mitomycin-C in the treatment of primary and recurrent pterygium.<br /><strong>METHODS:</strong> This was a prospective, randomized, interventional comparative study of patients with primary and recurrent pterygium who were randomized to receive either simple excision with conjunctival autograft (CA) or simple excision with CA and mitomycM-C applied. They were followed up for 6 months and observed for recurrence of the pterygium. Statistical analyses were used to compare the 2 groups.<br /><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Fifty-eight patients (62 eyes) diagnosed with primary and recurrent pterygium were evaluated. The mean age was 44.81 ± 12.35 years (range 25 to 70 years). Thirty eyes were treated with conjunctival autograft (15 primary, 15 recurrent) and 32 eyes (17 primary, 15 recurrent) with conjunctival autograft combined with Mtraoperati-ve application of low-dose raitomycin. -C (0.02% for 3 minutes). The mean follow-up period was 25 ± 1.40 months (range 24 to 28 months). There was a 3.22% recurrence rate (2 eyes) from the recurrent pterygium group. There was no significant difference 11.1  the rate of recurrence (p = 0.53) between the 2 treatments for both primary and recurrent pterygium. No mitomycM C-related complication was observed during the length of the study.<br /><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Conjunctival autograft surgery alone for primary and recurrent pterygium is effective and safe in reducing the recurrence rate of pterygium within" 6 months.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Adult , Pterygium , Mitomycin , Autografts , Conjunctiva , Transplantation, Autologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL